top of page

Radio’s Streaming Effort May Be Screwed – Part 1

Sep 18, 2017
4 min read

It’s one of the most disturbing results from the recent Triton streaming audio trends report, and most broadcasters are looking the other way.

This is the picture I’m talking about:

The charts show year-over-year streaming listening growth for pureplays (e.g., Spotify, Pandora, etc.) and for broadcasters.

And it clearly shows two things: Pureplay listening is rising rapidly – it’s up more than 16% overall year-over year; meanwhile streaming listening to broadcast brands – the very same radio stations that almost everyone listens to for at least some time in an average week – is down by more than 1.5% year-over-year.

We know that audiences are flocking to digital platforms. Record quantities of media are being consumed on those (largely mobile) platforms. This explains the dramatic increase for pureplay listening. 16% in one year is huge!

But if audiences and time and attention are flocking to digital platforms, how do we explain the clear erosion in the listening to radio streams?

Listeners are letting their listening do the talking for them. And what that listening is saying should chill you:

Radio is not getting more important on digital platforms. It’s actually getting less important. The growth rate is not just well behind the growth in pureplay listening, consumption of broadcast radio brands online is actually shrinking.

But why?

And what does that mean for you?

Consider this:

Your radio brand is ubiquitous and on a platform familiar to almost everyone who wants to listen to it. That platform is the one we call “radio” and that audience includes listeners within your signal radius. These people can and do listen to your station using the technology they have grown up with in the places where they have always listened. Digital access does not generally solve a problem for them because they don’t generally have a problem getting your station in the first place.

Meanwhile, what you provide via that digital access is the same thing with the same feature set as what can be heard over the air, so there’s not much reason to seek your content out on digital platforms.

See, digital is a place for content which is different from radio or more than radio. Not “better,” just different.

Digital is a place for audio entertainment to be enhanced by other functionality: It’s a place to get great podcasts you can’t hear on the radio and/or get them on demand; it’s a place to hear exactly the song you want and not wait for it to arise in rotation; it’s a place to avoid the chit-chat and dodge the onerous commercial load; it’s a place that recognizes who you are and what you want to hear without reducing those tastes to the lowest common denominator. It’s a place for you to experience something which is impossible through a radio alone. It’s a place for you to be your own curator and not rely on the wisdom of the crowd for music selections. In fact, the reason to listen to audio content on digital platforms is, in a sense, because it is not radio.

And here’s what else digital is not: It’s not simply a new distribution channel for your legacy content. The logic of your presence there should not only be “we have to be everywhere.”

Disney movies need to “be everywhere” because Disney movies are utterly unique. But the less utterly unique your brand is the less appetite there is for it to be everywhere because the more ways consumers have to substitute for your brand. So the single biggest driver for SiriusXM’s streaming platform is (I hear) Howard Stern, not the dime-a-dozen hits channel. If I want a stream of hits, there are literally thousands of places and ways to get one. Hits channels sprout like flowers in the springtime online. Does the world need another one? How many stations called “KISS” do listeners want on the iHeartRadio app?

I see this fallacy playing out on every new distribution channel that comes down the pike. Indeed, I see it again in the case of Alexa-style smart speakers:

Here’s the argument: Because Amazon Echo and Google Home and their like exist, and because they are voice-activated audio tools, and because consumer use of this category is growing, your radio station should be easily accessible there. “We have to be where the puck is headed,” right? And while this argument isn’t wrong (no, there shouldn’t be audio playgrounds where radio ceases to exist), it’s not as right as you think it is. And the reason is simple:

Just because a platform distributes audio doesn’t mean consumers want your audio on it. And if you want proof of that, look no further than the streaming statistics shown above.Just because a platform distributes audio doesn’t mean consumers want your audio on it Click To Tweet

Let me put it another way: The perfect audio built for a radio experience is not necessarily the perfect cluster of features built for other experiences (and vice versa).

Too often we fail to see what’s right in front of our faces: The great thing about radio stations is that they’re built to be great radio stations, not great other things.

That means they’re built to be listened to passively, not actively (thanks for nothing, Nielsen PPM). They’re they’re built to offer the content that offends no one and satisfies the average listener most of the time. They’re built to be consistent around the clock (meaning you don’t need this content on-demand, it’s always the same and always on). They’re built to balance the desires of listeners (the customers) with advertisers (the clients). They’re built to provide a mix of services, not just one (e.g., information, community, entertainment, and music).

So that decline in streaming for radio brands is more than a blip, it’s a sign of the times. Small wonder iHeartRadio is exploring subscription services and podcasts – that – not streaming radio stations – is where the growth is.

So your streaming strategy may be screwed, irrespective of what digital platform you drop your audio onto. But now what do you do?

I’ll tell you tomorrow in Part 2.

35 Comments


 Every online platform has room for improvement, and listening to visitor feedback can be a useful starting point. Some people may want simpler navigation, while 9k club Apk others might need clearer instructions or better mobile performance. Reviewing these common concerns can help website owners identify practical changes. I also believe that regularly checking links and updating old articles is important. Small improvements made consistently can create a better experience over time and make the website more useful for returning visitors.

Like

I genuinely enjoyed reading this shayari because it feels so close to real emotions. Every line has a smooth flow, and the shayari love words seem carefully chosen without sounding artificial. Some parts reminded me of people and moments from the past, which made the poetry feel personal. I especially liked the peaceful tone throughout the piece. It is amazing how a few simple lines can express feelings that are sometimes difficult to explain in everyday conversations.

Like

I like the simple structure of this game because it doesn’t take much time to understand. The main options are easy to locate, and the overall interface feels organized. I was able to get familiar with the platform after using it a few times. The experience has been smooth for me during casual sessions. A clean layout and clear navigation can make a big difference, and I think this platform does that reasonably well.

bg678 apk

Like

I appreciate the effort behind this content because the writer has explained the subject carefully while keeping the overall language natural and reader friendly.

big Mumbai login

Like

The practical information included in this article adds a lot of value to the overall discussion. Instead of keeping everything at a general level, the author explores details that can help readers understand the subject more realistically. Daman Game Login I liked the clear structure and the comfortable pace of the writing. The post remained interesting throughout and gave me a few useful ideas that I had not considered before.

Like
bottom of page