What Radio Looks Like on Ford’s New Sync 3 for 2016


Never let it be said that the automakers don’t listen to feedback, because when it comes to Ford’s clunky Sync platform, they got an earful.

And guess what? Ford responded.

This week the automaker introduced the latest and greatest version of its Sync infotainment system, and it looks great. It will make its debut on at least some Ford 2016 models, meaning it will be in the showroom in the fall of 2015, just months from now.

The primary value proposition of the platform has less to do with entertainment than it has to do with all the other problems faced by drivers as you can see in this video from Consumer Reports.

But I don’t want to focus on the entire feature set of the platform. I’m interested only in how it handles audio or – more precisely – how it redefines “radio” to be part of a larger platform called “audio” (a redefinition more broadcasters should absorb, if you ask me).

Watch this very short video and you’ll see a Ford representative demonstrate Pandora on the platform. And you’ll see where Pandora and other apps sit relative to AM and FM.

Two observations:

  1. Whatever audio is running becomes the “default audio source.” So when you press the “audio” button it’s all about whatever’s running. Thus there’s no “choice” to be made at the point of selecting “audio” unless you want to make a choice different from the default one. This is a better user experience, but one that creates momentum for whatever app or service is “already running.”
  2. To paraphrase the Ford employee, “another great thing about the system” is that media apps (e.g., Pandora, Spotify, etc.) will show up on the menu “right alongside” FM and AM and SiriusXM.

That “equal treatment” is precisely what the user wants – equal access to whatever they want however they want it.

That “equal treatment” will also elevate the status of apps which were previously unused or little used in the car to rival the familiar “apps” called FM and AM. And that elevation will increase usage – dramatically. And that usage will come from the previously habitual apps which occupied the greatest share of in-car listening, namely: Terrestrial radio.

So here are a few realities that need to be recognized:

  1. “FM” and “AM” used to be the entire infotainment system. Increasingly, they are “apps” like any other entertainment apps.
  2. The usage for “FM” and “AM” will naturally be cannibalized by other “equal” apps with similar or different value propositions. Since this is what the consumer wants, there is nothing you can do about this.
  3. Some of that cannibalization will be by radio “apps” which are not “FM” or “AM” – namely, aggregator apps like TuneIn or IHeartRadio, among others. So some of what a station loses in one app it stands to gain in another.
  4. Over the long run it will take more than habit to keep listeners glued to their heritage “apps” called “FM” and “AM.” It will take the promise of an experience uniquely compelling – one so good it can’t be routed around or reconstructed on other platforms. I continue to believe that this means an experience in content which is unmatchable.
  5. Sync 3 and other platforms of this type are an enormous gift to online radio apps like Spotify and Pandora.

I still don’t get all this fretting about the new dashboard. The future is playing out in a manner that is actually more predictable than most technologically-enabled futures. Here it comes, right on schedule!

If your brand is to attract attention and usage on a crowded dashboard packed with shiny baubles and new value propositions, then you had better create the kind of audio experience only radio can be famous for: A unique and compelling content experience that strives to be spectacular.

Start thinking out of the box. Look to talent. Get out your checkbook.

No longer will there be any shortcuts or shoestring successes.

* = required field
  • HD Farce

    With all the reception problems with HD Radio, it looks like the new Sync still has HD, even though Ford is an iBiquity investor. GM was smart to dump it from some of their 2016 models… Greg Smith

  • disqus_FMoeuWYW0Y

    A major Ford downfall is to BIND/INBREED their SYNC system to the crappy SONY LOW END (so much for premium) receiver/amp sound system. They need to split their SYNC from the receiver/amp so that those of us who want real and great sound/music can update the system and keep the Ford SYNC hardware. I personally like the Ford 8″ screen and Sync 3 setup. Just detest the ‘dirty’ el-cheapo sony stuff they call “premium”. By the way, I can replace the entire shit mess with a Kenwood Excelon (don’t like Kenwood) Focal speakers, and a good JL amp and sub for less than they charge us for the low-end (premium) Sony stuff. “This ain’t no 1970 transistor radio…” ONLY a 3 band EQ? Seriously? Unbelievable waveform distortion just over 1/4 volume? What a way to screw up the sound. At best this can be called “Above Stock (b/c it has enough speakers (2+) to be considered stereo)”. Been an engineer for going on 40 years and if this ain’t “shittin’ the bed” when it comes to minimal decent audio, I don’t know what is. WTF is a “center channel” speaker doing in a vehicle? I’m driving, not watching a damn movie! If it is meant for voice commands, then isolate it to voice activities. Anyway, I could go on. I’m a die-hard FORD guy and have been fighting their shitty audio for years (and at 70-80+++ grand for a truck; a highly depreciating liability (not asset; it’s used and thrown away in the end, it 99% of the time does NOT increase in value)…. [insert comment here]). Too bad Dodge could make a damn Alpine sound better for less! And Alpine isn’t even on the map anymore. Ford and Sony need a divorce, and soon! FORD, listen up, you didn’t take the bribe money, so stop the crap and get with the program! FWIW In My NOT So Humble Opinion (IMNSHO).

Dive Into The Blog