BLOG

When Radio has No Idea what to Put on its Websites

If you have any conversation with anyone deep in the digital media space you will hear many references to the folks who put content out there online, and those folks will invariably be referred to as “publishers.”

Even radio stations are thought of as publishers.  In fact, in the media space online, there is no such thing as radio per se, there are only publishers and content where that content can span any number of media types or channels.

The consequences of this for your radio station are profound.  See, the average radio station views its website as a promotional tool and they view their sign-up list as a contest tool.

To some broadcasters, the web, in other words, is nothing more than a low budget marketing tool and a convenient way to sign up folks for contests.

That’s fine in a world where nothing matters but the agency dollars that flow to traditional over-the-air buys.  It’s not so fine in a world where those dollars are shrinking and spreading to other – more accountable – alternatives.

That’s why it’s time for you to view yourself as a publisher, not a radio station.

And if you’re a publisher, then why don’t you have subscribers?

I have subscribers – people who have signed up for my content because of the value inherent in it, not because they have been bribed to do so, not because they stand a chance to win something, but because (God forbid) they actually like it (or at least like to dislike it).  Why don’t you have subscribers?

You don’t “register to win” a subscription, you register for value from that subscription.

When you think about the bigger, broader needs and interests your audience has – especially in no-brainer content formats like Sports and News/Talk – subscriptions should be easy.  Instead they’re few and far between.

You might think, for example, that the local Sports station would feature content by local sports nuts, mixing it up with each other – a community of controversy.  Right?  In most cases, wrong.  The U.S. Army has over 100 volunteer bloggers.  How many do you have?

I could go on and on, but you get the point.  Every station has a base of consumers marked by specific needs – generally the ones that unify them on that particular station.

We could publish content that attracts them and bonds them to our brands. But too often, we don’t.

Why not?

Rest assured, if you don’t someone else will.

11 Comments;
  • Jim

    Mark, this is a great thought, but most radio stations don't have any quality content ON-THE-AIR. Where do you think they are going to get content for the web that anyone wants to pay money for?

  • http://www.markramseymedia.com Mark Ramsey

    I'm not suggesting stations charge listeners for what's on the air. I'm saying they can monetize that content with advertisers if it attracts enough consumers.

    The answer to your question will be different for every station and will depend on the personalities at the helm.

    But one thing's for sure: Throwing our arms up in the air and surrendering is no answer.

  • http://thejeffbrown.me Jeff Brown

    I was excited to read your thoughts in this post. We've recently branched out and started our own local blog (something I don't believe any of our other stations are doing), enlisting volunteer bloggers (i.e. listeners, fans, etc.) along the way.

    While we're just in the baby steps stage (5 volunteers vs 100), I'm looking forward to what the future holds.

  • http://www.markramseymedia.com Mark Ramsey

    Take a lesson from Jeff, everybody.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1543825455 Tom Duffy

    It's hard to take you seriously as a writer when your very first sentence has a misspelled word!

  • http://www.markramseymedia.com Mark Ramsey

    Thank you. I fixed it. Nice bedside manner, by the way.

  • http://www.futureofradioonline.com Charles Andrew Whatley

    Defining and speaking of radio stations as “publishers” as well as any other legacy media entity with a website, has long been in my lexicon. I could not agree with you more!

  • http://twitter.com/radioinsight RadioInsight.com

    I had a very spirited debate about this the other day. You first have to get many stations to create content without relying on prep services.

    In a perfect world a News/Talk station would have a hyper-local news blog attached. A sports blog network similar to SNY.tv would work easily on levels much smaller than New York. Even if you had one person posting links to the best viral videos on a consistent basis you'd be increasing demand for your site. It's not hard, it just takes effort.

  • http://www.markramseymedia.com Mark Ramsey

    It had better be a perfect world soon.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Scott-MacKenzie/1066263194 Scott MacKenzie

    Because of mobile and smart phones, your website is digital radio with sound, video and pictures plus web analytics. Some day listening on mobile might be more than FM!

  • John Duncan

    Content is something that takes time and budget to create, both in short supply at many radio stations these days. And truly, many stations don't create much if any content anyway; at best, these stations could only be content aggregators. But that's not a bad thing, because what most stations DO have is a brand, which they can use to attract subscribers once they actually have content to offer.

    For stations that can create content, it's all about having someone in place to make it available. Interns can be very valuable in this role, creating short entertaining clips from the morning show, editing and uploading interviews done on the station, updating local sales charts, classfied advertising, public service announcements, editorials (something too few stations do these days), etc.

Sign Up For Blog Email Updates

About

MRM President Mark Ramsey has worked with innumerable television and radio broadcasters over his career, including all the biggest names, from Clear Channel, CBS, Bonneville, Sirius XM...

Mark Ramsey