BLOG

Pandora again dominates Online Radio Metrics, and why that matters to you

Pandora_logo  The new AndoMedia streaming metrics for December have been published, and not surprisingly, Pandora reigns at the top of the hill.

In fact, there are more than 300,000 listeners tuned to Pandora in any given time on average.

That's as many as CBS Radio and Clear Channel – combined.

And you can take the next 17 groups in Ando's ranking, combine them, and you'd still have to double them to equal Pandora's dominance.

As admirable as Pandora's number is, I think it only scratches the surface of the kind of listenership that's possible over time.  Pandora lacks the habit your station enjoys, for example.  It lacks the ubiquity.  It lacks the ease of use.  It lacks your "loudspeaker" – your reach.  It lacks so much of what makes radio a mass medium.

At least for now.  And not forever.

And yet, Pandora rules anyway.  That's why these stats raise legitimate questions about the streaming strategies of broadcasters.

I've said it before and I'll continue to preach it: Online radio is not ONLY where you repurpose your terrestrial signal, it's a playground for more content and more value propositions, powered in part by the reach of your over-the-air loudspeaker.  

Imagine what the Pandora numbers would be if they advertised their offerings on your stations.  They would be infinitely greater than what they are now.  Well, you have the same capability to drive your audiences to worthy online destinations and it won't cost you a penny.

The key is to be worthy.

One job of the broadcaster is to provide audiences with more stuff to listen to that's worth seeking out. That, in turn, will drive usage.  And only then will come monetization.  Wish as we might, it doesn't happen the other way around.

Online radio is a place to attract listeners to things worth listening to that they can't hear in that form anywhere else. Even over the air (maybe especially over the air).

Broadcasters need to get serious about their online radio strategies.

Otherwise, online streams from conventional broadcasters will become to listeners what leftovers are to foodies.

8 Comments;
  • George

    Just looking at these numbers and saying Pandora is beating terrestrial isn’t really fair. The CBS and Clear Channel offerings, for the most part, are steams of local stations. Pandora is a national service. I’m not aware that any of the major companies offer something that falls into a national music streaming service, along the lines of Pandora, Lala, etc. Perhaps CC’s I(heart)Radio, or CBS’s Yahoo or AOL streams could be considered national. But this is mostly an apples & oranges comparison. Do I care about local weather or traffic in some city where I don’t live? No. Could these companies compete on this platform? Sure, but they’d need some kind of distinguishing characteristic from the popular ones already out there. Would it make a difference to their bottom line? Maybe.
    Radio sees its primary value in being local. Pandora doesn’t. The question is: Is being local what the audience wants? What do the numbers say about that?

  • Harvey Kojan

    Good stuff as usual, Mark, but it’s more preaching to the converted. With few exceptions, the guys who run terrestrial radio aren’t buying what you’re selling. They’re consumed with making money NOW, not looking to the future. They have no real “digital strategy.” Unless it can be monetized TODAY it’s not going to happen.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/mramsey1 Mark Ramsey

    There’s no “but” about preaching to the converted, Harvey.
    The future belongs to the converted :-) .

  • http://profile.typepad.com/mramsey1 Mark Ramsey

    George, you could also look at this another way….
    Pandora is powered without any broadcast loudspeaker. Clear Channel, for one, has more than a thousand such loudspeakers and millions of consumers who have relationships, to one degree or another, with Clear Channel stations.
    So is the comparison less fair to Pandora or to Clear Channel? I think it’s the former, actually.

  • George

    Diversity of portals doesn’t lead to unification of the audience. Whereas Pandora focuses all of its business on one single portal. So although CC has many stations to reach the audience, that audience has many ways to receive CC. Not all of them are counted using this metric. Pandora has only one.
    Centralization is good for building numbers and a brand identity. CC doesn’t have that. Pandora does. Using Malcolm Gladwell’s lesson about spaghetti sauce, it’s fine to have 23 different flavors, as long as they’re all called Prego.
    If radio wants to win on this platform, they have to learn how this platform works. I don’t think the current system is set up in a way that will maximize their potential. But then again, they’re balancing several platforms. Pandora isn’t.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/mramsey1 Mark Ramsey

    Actually Pandora has numerous portals. Mobile is one. Desktop is another. I was listening to it on my TV via my Roku this past weekend.
    Nevertheless, i don’t want to get stuck in a debate of semantics. Your central point is that radio doesn’t understand how this platform works, and I think they don’t WANT to understand how this platform works.
    And some of the insider information I have is testimony to this point. And at the right time, I’ll rant about that. And it will curl the toes of any right-thinking person.

  • http://myspace.com/djterrenceromero terrence.romero@gmail.com

    How come people in terrestrial radio still want to argue the facts with you Mark? lol

  • http://profile.typepad.com/mramsey1 Mark Ramsey

    Depending on the person, sometimes they’re right.
    Thanks Terrence!

Sign Up For Blog Email Updates

About

MRM President Mark Ramsey has worked with innumerable television and radio broadcasters over his career, including all the biggest names, from Clear Channel, CBS, Bonneville, Sirius XM...

Mark Ramsey