BLOG

Remember when “Music” was on the Radio?

FM Sports is not "the next big thing" in radio.

FM Talk is not "the next big thing" in radio.

The "next big thing" in radio is the gradual disappearance of music stations to be replaced by non-music stations, whether they are Talk, Sports, or new formulas yet to be devised.

The fact is that music stations will increasingly be at a competitive disadvantage regardless of their legendary status in the radio industry.  That, obviously, is due to the rise of the Internet and the plethora of music distribution options it makes available in our homes, workplaces, and cars.  As I always like to say "heritage" is worthless unless it adds value to the audience.  Otherwise, "heritage" represents "old radio stations."

I'm not saying all music stations will eventually disappear.  I am saying that this trend is inexorable.  

So if you're in the radio industry, I recommend the following:

1.  Stop using the term "FM" in front of Talk formats as if they live on some other planet.  "FM" is a channel of distribution – the most popular one – not a format descriptor.  To use "FM" in the label makes us focus too much on the channel and not enough on the content.  A few years ago I was on an opening panel at a Talk convention and the first question was "Does FM Talk have a future?"  And although my answer wasn't "stop asking dumb questions," it should have been.

2.  Get busy dreaming up new formulas.  If you think that the appetite for non-music content begins and ends with Sports and Political Talk and whatever slim recipes we have beyond that you will miss the boat completely.  Want ideas for new formats that are non-music?  Just turn on your cable TV.  Your company can't afford to experiment?  Even online?  Too bad.  It will mean your demise.

In the long run, radio's advantage – whether it be on-air or online – will be related to the compelling power and distinctiveness of our content.  And the sheer clutter of competition will make compelling and distinctive music brands with loyal audiences far fewer and farther between.

So get busy.

View Comments
  • I have started a website called "Sports Inner City Online" at www.sportsinnercity.com It covers "urban sports" news and issues. That means people of color in the sports world. Right now, I have "Music Inner City Radio" on the site, but I am going to start calling it "Sports Inner City Radio". With exclusive interviews with African Americans and people of color in the sports world. Not to many people are doing this on the net. I hope to make some money soon with commercials etc. I think this can do well.
  • Mark O'Neill
    This is exactly why public radio's share and reach are both heading upwards. Here in Canada, CBC Radio One (news, current affairs and other non-music programming) is enjoying historically high ratings including the #1 morning shows in most major markets.
    Mark
  • I agree with your vision and my business partner and I have created a talk radio show online focusing on information for business owners and top executives in the Orange County CA market.
    The response from the listening audience has been great. The fact that we can build a loyal niche and build it is directly related to cost effectiveness of internet radio.
    Thanks wwww.latalkradio.com
  • George
    I agree with what you wrote. Some of us remember the impact MTV had in the 80s and 90s. Obviously by the mid-90s, the music had spintered and it was harder for one network to present all the popular music of the time. The rockers battled the rappers, and the boy bands battled the hair bands. One day, the folks at MTV realized that some of their non-music programming was as compelling for the audience as the music. Plus, one small benefit, was they OWNED the non-music programming. So they could sell and merchandise it. For the first time, the music videos they got for free were not as valuable as the programming they created and owned. I was at a music conference a few years ago, and a guy from the music industry said "Remember when music was on MTV? What happened?" I believe we are approaching that same point on the radio. That will especially be true if the labels force their royalty on radio.
  • Mark,
    I think it's an inevitability.
    I have been suggesting this ever since this issue regarding the CRB Royalties/SoundExchange v. internet radio reared its ugly head.
    We created this mess in internet music by creating streams of music which ran 24/7. This, at the time, must have looked like "golden streams" to SoundExchange/RIAA, a real opportunity to bolster the RIAA's sagging profits.
    These streams would have looked less attractive had each broadcaster worked to achieve some (possibly) mandated balance between talk and music. Even a 40/60 balance would have looked less attractive than a endless streams of music, to which broadcasters had no rights but SoundExchange with their massive moneyed lobbying efforts convinced Congress they had a stake.
    But hindsight is 20/20 isn't it? Oh, well...
    David W. King
    Cross Harp Chronicles/
    Just Roots PR
blog comments powered by Disqus

Sign Up For Blog Email Updates

About

MRM President Mark Ramsey has worked with innumerable television and radio broadcasters over his career, including all the biggest names, from Clear Channel, CBS, Bonneville, Sirius XM...

Mark Ramsey