BLOG

10 Predictions for Radio’s Next 5 Years

Ccarol5
Do you remember the scene in the 1951 classic A Christmas Carol, when the Ghost of Christmas Present tells Ebenezer Scrooge that, while he sees Tiny Tim's chair empty in a corner, "these are visions of things which may be, not things which will be."

Here are ten predictions for Radio's next few years – visions of things which may be.

1. Radio will recognize that to be more attractive than other sound-alike alternatives – to retain more of its existing audience – it must count on more than habit, convenience, familiarity, ease of use, and the often-proclaimed almost-universal reach of the medium, since all those advantages are transitory. 

2. The advantage of "local" will diminish in direct proportion to the disappearance of local content on stations – and here I'm talking about the local content between the songs (the very stuff that makes the PPM meters tank). 

3. The formats which rise (to the degree that formats rise) will be the ones catering specifically to audiences who are less tech savvy or the old dogs who don’t wish to be taught new tricks. Look for Spanish language radio to be the big winner here along with anything targeting aging Boomers. 

4. Ratings will decline in importance as advertisers make decisions based on accountability and results rather than on how many ears a station reaches. As more dollars that would have gone to radio head to destinations outside Arbitron's sphere, stations will cancel their Arbitron deals and never look back. 

5. FM stations will move in one of two ways: Either stripped of anything but music (low-cost proposition) or stripped of music and focused all Talk or other non-music entertainment (high-value proposition). Radio will function more like movies: Cheap Indies with low costs and lower profit dollars (but higher margins) and expensive blockbusters with high costs and higher profit dollars (and lower margins). 

6. There will be a renaissance in national non-music programming, assuming somebody somewhere in or out of radio bothers to look for it and take a chance on it (Jerry Bruckheimer, where are you?). When these shows are launched, they will launch across dozens of stations at once, not be introduced organically one station at a time. The organic approach to talk show growth is over. Success will depend on mass exposure and mass audiences. Introducing a new show in 100 markets at once multiplies the impact that show has in a world where listeners are no longer bound by their Metro Survey Area. NBC will not be launching the new Jay Leno show one market at a time, and neither should you. Further, Non-Music Radio will not be limited to "Talk" exclusively, let alone Conservative Political Talk.

7. Stations will look to their digital strategies for their bread and butter. Broadcasters who can't keep pace with digital opportunities will be out on the street. The tower will become the marketing tool for the digital strategies, not vice versa. Digital dollars will exceed over-the-air dollars in part because there will no longer be such a thing as dollars which are only "over-the-air."

8. Power will flow to the talent and to the owners of that talent's distribution. No longer will we expect a talent to do three or four hours, five days a week. We’ll see shorter, less frequent content – repeated more often.  And we'll see more flavors of content stretched across more distribution channels.

9. Much of the non-music content on TV will be simulcast on radio, thus extending the distribution for TV content at a comparatively low cost and reframing many stations as distribution channels for TV – without pictures. CNN, FOX, MSNBC, E!….It will all be on a radio station near you. 

10. Stations will recognize that their primary value is in their audiences – each one with a name, an email address, and specific wants, needs, and behaviors – all of which can be noted and tracked (within the constraints of privacy concerns) such that radio can treat listeners as individuals rather than faceless, nameless "cume." This way, stations will connect the right listeners with the right marketers and provide value that vastly exceeds anything radio has ever provided before and anything Google or Facebook can match on a local level. 

Remember, visions of things that may be.

And God bless us, every one.
9 Comments;
  • http://www.cellit.com Steve Poley, CELLit

    There is a wonderful world of local opportunity between galactic Google and the personal circles of MySpace. Powerful digital tools can bring local content into the broadcast and fill the void between you, merchants, and your audience. Your listeners post pictures and videos on MySpace/Facebook, but they still enjoy broader community recognition. Digital tools on your website are the next step. If you really want to engage the community then find the biggest MySpace person in your community and put them in charge of your website. Start involving your audience and you will start to grow again.

  • http://www.precipice.wordpress.com Jeff Schmidt

    Trend wise, I think you’re very, very on target, Mark.
    But there is one big “provoker of change’ in radio’s future I’m surprised you left out.
    Financial Insolvency.
    It’s not hyperbole to suggest Radio will undergo some pretty substantial financial restructuring (even several Chapt 11 filings)
    The next few years in radio are going to be largely pre-occupied with controlling costs – in the extreme. Hard to see anything forward looking coming out of that headspace.
    So, I think some of your predictions will occur not because broadcasters become “enlightened” to new ways – rather, they stumble on them because they are the cheapest option available in a highly pressurized cost cutting environment.
    So my money -(or peanuts as the case may be) is on Predictions 2,3,5,6 & 9

  • Jim Ryan

    Jeff has it right. Projecting his line of thinking further, radio broadcasters will find that the burden of their financial disadvantage and necessity to restructure from their secular space will not only limit their ability to transition their listeners and attract new users but unless they are a “first mover” with a bold, bright new concept, piranhas will devourer from all sides. I mean to say that there are a lot of bright people and companies within the broad digital space. Interestingly, few are successful at monetizing their brilliance.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/6p0105369ce75d970b Commander Col. Klink

    What advantage do broadcasters have over from webcasters? Towers.
    Wireless web access will be ubiquitous, with every automobile being web enabled. Web radio’s will be better suited for consumer needs and more popular than HD receivers.
    Nationwide wireless web access is on our horizon, with consumers receiving content via paid or free access supported by advertisers.
    And get ready for URADIO created in many forms and colors. Commercial broadcasters will be competing head on with a guy or gal creating basement content.
    Google that!

  • http://profile.typepad.com/drewdeal drewdeal

    3 points here:
    1) your point #9 is the only one I strongly disagree with. Repurposing is already a disadvantage. Newscasts and sportscasts for example will have their radio counterparts to television for a long time. Since digital video continues to be on the rise, I don’t see any tolerance for audio stripped from a video production.
    2) Whether Jeff is right depends on radio’s leaders. I am out on the limb all the time on this one, believing they will make the right choices before fire sale decisions force them to be made on the cheap. Don’t let me down guys! Call me. :-)
    3) To Col Klink’s point… Broadcasters are gradually converging into becoming webcasters, so the tower will be more than a singular asset, but will define a base under which all their multi-casting can be anchored. Station owners who get this are the ones that I want to have a beer with.

  • http://profile.typepad.com/mramsey1 Mark Ramsey

    Hi Andrew!
    The tolerance for audio stripped of video is shown in the strength of certain Satellite Radio channels that do exactly that and are among the most popular of Satellite’s non-music offerings.

  • Randy

    I pretty much agree with these predictions, but the disappearance of local content worries me. I can get music anywhere – on my iPod, mobile device or the internet – the only reason to listen to local radio is to, well, get LOCAL content and be entertained in ways I can’t be when just listening to music. Do you think being local is actually a detriment to radio? I tend to think the local aspects (whether on an FM band or chunked onto new media) are radio’s only hope of keeping (and attracting) listeners.

  • Barry O’Brien

    “Local” is a place in your mind, not where your body is. Many times…..and for lots of people, all of the time…your mind and body are in the same location. But not everyone. I am in West Palm Beach all winter (thank God), but I listen to, watch, and read Boston media at least 10 times as much as I consume West Palm media, because Boston is “home” to me. Today, I listened to WBZ and WTKK online, I looked at the Channel 7, NECN and Channel 5 websites, and read Boston.com and Bostonhearald.com. Since I used to live in DC, I also monitor WTOP and Washingtonpost.com. So to everyone who says that radio has to be local, I agree. But….the definition of local is changing….and it’s different for everyone. And it keeps changing.

  • Tom Cavallaro

    Hey loved the top ten… whats your thoughts for Online radio,
    G3 able delivery to the automobile and hand held mobile?
    Moore’s law says G4 & G5 are just around the bend….
    I’m asking because I’m launching a station for CBS in NY-DMA
    “Chat About It NY” is the working name launched April 6th…
    This will launch with block paid programming and modify as time goes on.. will be promoted by 18 CBS NY-DMA assets.

Sign Up For Blog Email Updates

About

MRM President Mark Ramsey has worked with innumerable television and radio broadcasters over his career, including all the biggest names, from Clear Channel, CBS, Bonneville, Sirius XM...

Mark Ramsey