BLOG

Apple + Lala = Radio

Lala Lala is a music service that stores songs online and sells them in streaming form at a deep discount.  And Apple has just snapped up this company for undisclosed terms.

As Wired notes, Lala sells pre-paid chunks of music as credits rather than individual songs (although they sell those, too).  Users pay 10 cents per song for permanent access to "web songs" that can be streamed but not downloaded.  

And what do you call your favorite songs that you don't own but you have permanent access to?  You call it "radio," folks. Except in radio's case it's the advertiser paying the 10 cents. 

Writes Wired:

Lala can play the last few hundred songs from a cache when there’s no internet connection which lets it play cloud-based music in subways, highways and remote locations.

Cached music – no web access required.  Sounds like radio to me.

The next version of iTunes could introduce more music fans to the idea of buying cheap music streamed from the cloud and listening to a huge catalog on a device with limited memory.

One of the big reasons people buy CD's or DVD's or books – even in this increasingly digital age – is the "collectible" aspect of the experience.  You have something tangible to show for your effort.  There's a kinesthetic value to the purchase.

Not so in the iTunes world, where the difference between "buying" a song and "renting" it for an infinite number of plays is really quite trivial, as long as you can access that song wherever you want it.

A move by Apple in the direction of streaming music easily and cheaply will dramatically blow up the market for online radio.  This will increase the market for what radio stations offer online (whether or not radio will benefit from that broader market is a different question) while at the same time creating a highly attractive substitute for radio which, while not free, is customizable, relatively inexpensive, and perhaps every bit as ubiquitous as radio itself.

In the near term we will see this explosion of listener-paid models alongside an explosion of advertiser-supported ones.  It will be critical not only to be a player in the online streaming game, but a player playing a game unique enough to attract an audience that can get the music part of you from countless places.

This will again push broadcasters to reconsider what their unique proposition is in the digital space.  We will have to stream more things and more different things.  We will have to stream much more non-music content and invest in such content.  We will have to consider models which invite listeners to pay for such content (which, of course, public radio and Sirius has been doing for years).

While we obsess on whether or not iPods should contain FM receivers, Apple seems to be bent on turning the iPod itself into one big "FM receiver."

Just one that doesn't require "radio" or "broadcasters."

View Comments
  • George, not only does Lala compete with listener-supported services, it does so requiring some degree of WORK on the part of listeners.
    One of the great strengths of radio is that you don't have to infuse WORK into it. I didn't mention this in the post because a strategy of targeting the passives is a one-way journey into long-term decline.
    I have long believed that radio - the commercial kind - needs more sources of revenue than advertising alone. And one of those will be the audience.
    As you know, it's amazing how your thinking can be transformed when the customer becomes the listener, not the agency.
  • These are good points.
    I think that any "great" radio content has a toe in all the waters you mention.
    Otherwise, by definition, it's not "great" radio content.
  • Well those aspects alone will make iTunes more valuable, Andy (except for the cheaper price, which I predict will go bye-bye).
    But iTunes has the market power to expend streaming whereas Lala obviously does not (otherwise Apple would have sought out Lala, rather than the other way around).
    When I say it's "radio," I mean it functions as radio functions to the end-user. I don't mean it's "somebody else's music."
  • George
    The other important difference between Lala and radio is who pays. So Lala isn't commercial radio, but rather non-commercial radio, and it competes with all listener-supported subscription services, not ad-supported radio. Subscription services put the listeners in charge of what they hear, not the advertisers. And the big problem, from commercial radio's perspective, is that ad-supported media is in deep trouble. It's in trouble because of falling ad rates and the fact that online advertising sells for 10% of the price of onair advertising. The only place that's not true now is Pandora, who has kept their ad prices high by limiting ad inventory.
    It always comes down to the money. As long as commercial radio is built around attracting advertising, it will control the content in order to get the ratings and demos the advertisers want. But listeners want control, and there are places they can get it, and that limits the universe radio can draw on for potential listeners. This leads me to believe that at some point, commercial radio may have to turn its music programming over to non-commercial, subscription services in order to compete. So we have commercial radio stations, like WQXR and WCRB, being sold to non-commercial entities, and are now listener-supported. Just last week, a member of Congress said that journalism may also be forced to change from ad-supported to subscription in order to survive. Yet at the same time, the public demonstrates that it wants free media. Now what?
  • Radio is not immune to the music industry's changes. its a continium and somewhere along the line music radio will be impacted - its only a matter of when and how deeply.
    I always worry when people advocate better "radio" content as a way to win online. the digital space is primarily visual and not audio. until you see that google "audio" search button - i dont think the world's best podcast can compete with a good youtube video.
    the question then comes down to what business are you in: are you in the radio business, the music business, the entertainment business, the local information business .... and what does that look like in the future.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Sign Up For Blog Email Updates

About

MRM President Mark Ramsey has worked with innumerable television and radio broadcasters over his career, including all the biggest names, from Clear Channel, CBS, Bonneville, Sirius XM...

Mark Ramsey