BLOG

Radio “Beyond Acceptance”

My friend (and esteemed marketing consultant) Tom Asacker just posted a new article which opens with this:

The following landed in my inbox last week in an email titled “NAB SmartBrief:” “Radio’s ‘challenge’ isn’t to retain its audience or remake its programming, but to convince marketers that the medium is still viable, according to Jeff Smulyan, Emmis chairman-CEO. ‘The challenge is the perception,’ Smulyan said during a conference call with analysts.

Really? I heard something similar from the CEO of General Motors a few months back. In essence he blamed his company’s fall on the uninformed, and misinformed, marketplace: “It’s the consumers, stupid!” Or maybe, it’s the stupid consumers. In any event, and with all due respect, if you believe that you need to “convince” your ignorant audience of the value of your offering, you simply don’t offer anything uniquely valuable. In this day and age, if you did, and people were interested, they’d figure it out.

Tom continues:

So what’s the solution? How do you stand out and move your organization forward in a hypercompetitive and rapidly changing marketplace? Simple (but not easy): You change with it! …It takes awareness and acceptance. And, I’d add, a laser-like focus on the outside world of your audience. But first, you must deal with your grief: the inevitable pain that comes with relevance lost, which is a predictable outcome of allowing your organization to fall out of step with the external environment.

Now I know that what broadcasters tell Wall Street and the media is often at odds with their real feelings and actions. In many cases the “What, me worry?” game face masks a very real sense of urgency to transform radio with the times.

In many – but not nearly all – cases. And many not even most. And that needs to change.

There are still broadcasters out there – high level ones – who think that our problems can be solved by doing more of what we’ve always done – but harder or faster. There are still those who view the iPod as a souped up Walkman. There are still those who view Slacker and Pandora as flashes in the pan. Many still believe that Facebook and Myspace have no relevance to radio’s future. And so on and so on.

Our problem is not one of public relations, folks. It’s one of acceptance. And, as Tom points out, getting well beyond acceptance and into action.

View Comments
  • Jim Ryan
    Here we go again - another marketing guru who attempts to find the problem but never attempts to offer any solutions. You get it Mr. Kerr - so does Jeff Smulyan - Code RED is about the advertisers, local, regional and national. It is about ad agencies. And where perception is reality...here is the reality. Does anyone remember what the media director from Zenith said at the NAB two years ago? - "Radio has become a tertiary line item at best". Please interpret it both as a reality and a perception. The rise of internet ad spend (now greater than radio) has directly affected radio ad spend more than any other traditional media. Primarily because of the fact that radio has always been considered no less than a secondary budget line item following Newspaper, TV, even direct mail and Outdoor. Budgets are generally finite and something had to give way to the high growth rate of the internet.
    So you want to address cell phone usage in cars and how it affects a person's commercial recall because the internet DOES affect newspaper readership and DVR's DO affect TV commercial viewership, or do you want to invest in the people, sales, consultants or otherwise, can effectively convey the ability of radio to "ring the cash register", regardless of "where a consumer uses radio"?
  • George
    OK...I'll play along.
    Name something that was declared "irrelevant" and somehow regained its relevance.
    Nehru jackets?
    Edsels?
    Telegraph?
    I'm just curious. Because perception IS a very difficult thing to change.
    Because in addition to changing the product, there has to be a desire by the public to WANT to change their perception.
    In other words, radio could become whatever the public wants it to become. But if the public is satisfied with some other product, it won't matter.
    And suppose SOME radio companies change their product more in line with what is relevant, and others don't. Is it guilt by association? Are all radio stations destined to suck because a handful actually do?
    It reminds me of the spaghetti sauce lecture you posted here a while ago.
  • I think Tom is way off base here. Jeff Smulyan's comments were about "marketers" and Tom applies them to consumers. And the difference between consumer use and acceptance of GM products and radio products is night and day.
    Radio continues to be utilized by more than 90% of the population of the country over the age of 12. The number of people who abandon radio is miniscule. So, in many ways, Smulyan is right: The story isn't that radio is dying or out of touch. The story is that consumers have more choices.
    I make this point over and over again: The real analogy of radio in 2008 is television in 1985. With the increasing prevalance of cable TV and more channels, the long steady erosion of network TV ratings began. However, the popularity of network TV didn't erode that much--it was the time spent on those channels.
    Radio is, for all intents and purposes, just as popular today as it was 20 years ago. It is just fighting for the attention of consumers using video games, watching DVDs, playing on Club Penguin, and mashing up their video submissions to the evil league of evil.
  • Great commentary on radio's continuing reliance on "inside the box" thinking, Mark.
    Was reading a post on Stereophile's website about image. It included a discussion of 1969 stereos, James Bond, and the art of spending too much money in order to get ... um, satisfied ... once you got that date into your swingin' pad.
    The sentence that stood out to me, and reminded me of this blog post is:
    Culture eats strategy for lunch.
    Inside-the-box thinking is going to keep losing out to our ever-changing culture. Outside the box, radio has so much possibility, promise and potential. Just gotta pry them big boys out!!
    (want to read the article? it's here: http://stereophile.com/asweseeit/808awsi/ )
  • ... and speaking of accepting that the game is changing, check THIS out;
    http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/...
blog comments powered by Disqus

Sign Up For Blog Email Updates

About

MRM President Mark Ramsey has worked with innumerable television and radio broadcasters over his career, including all the biggest names, from Clear Channel, CBS, Bonneville, Sirius XM...

Mark Ramsey